general posted by

Moon hoax

The Moon Hoax site sets out to prove that the Americans really DID land on the moon, despite all the hoax rumours.


  • The two camps always work with the following lemmas:
    Fake photos => fake landings
    real landings => real photos

    But what if the landings were real and the photos were fake.
    There are several good reasons to think that the astronauts couldn't take good photos on the moon.
    If Nixon saw lousy photos taken by the astronauts and very good photos made in a studio which were looking like they were taken on the moon, isn't it conceivable that he might have chosen the latter?
    I have good reasons to think that there are severe problems with the photos which can't be overlooked.
    I have made a thread to explain what these problems were, which make very difficult for me to accept these photos have been taken on the moon.
    See my thread (at the end I give a link to a video I made on youtube

    I have made this video in two versions: one for large monitors (by default), and another one for small monitors you can accede by clicking a link at the start of the thread.

comments powered by Disqus

Side Advert

Write For Us


Managing Editor:
Nigel Powell

Associate Editor:
Caitlyn Muncy
Associate Editor:
Dan Ferris
Ecological Editor:
Debra Atlas
Technology Editor:
Fritz Effenberger
Asian Editor:
Hu Ping
Reviews Editor:
Kevin Evans

FB Like Box